[Setup-tool-hackers] RE: 2.4: System Tools - Please try them

[Carlos Garnacho <garnacho tuxerver net>]

Hi!

please, have a look at
http://www.ultimaorbita.com/garnacho/screenshot.png

does this fit in your idea of services tool? at least it does in mine
:-P. I did this modification to runlevel-admin in this evening, and
still needs lots of love, but when it's ready I'll commit it

please! any feedback? :-)

	Regards

PD: the intelligent priority support is still a TODO :-)

El mar, 03-06-2003 a las 20:15, Seth Nickell escribió:

<snip>

> Most people don't care about the bootup sequence. They care about
> whether the service is running or not. A single checkbox would do just
> fine. It would be especially nice if when you checked the box, the
> service actually started and when you unchecked it, the service stopped
> (and of course, this also effects the "runlevel" settings... however
> RH's setup tool does it). It would be even cooler if there was some way
> to check if the service was running (for services which support this,
> like atalk, httpd, etc) and only show the checkbox as checked if it was.
> 
> This gets rid of the distinction between "service runs at bootup" and
> "service is running".
> 
> -Seth
> 
> 
_______________________________________________
setup-tool-hackers maillist  -  setup-tool-hackers@lists.ximian.com
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/setup-tool-hackers