[Setup-tool-hackers] RE: 2.4: System Tools - Please try them

[Mark Finlay <sisob eircom net>]

On Thu, 2003-06-26 at 20:09, Carlos Garnacho wrote:
> Hi!
> 
> please, have a look at
> http://www.ultimaorbita.com/garnacho/screenshot.png

The main dialog looks great - the properties dialog needs some more
love. I have no really useful suggestions cus I'm half asleep, but
"Parameters" has got to go

> 
> does this fit in your idea of services tool? at least it does in mine
> :-P. I did this modification to runlevel-admin in this evening, and
> still needs lots of love, but when it's ready I'll commit it
> 
> please! any feedback? :-)
> 
> 	Regards
> 
> PD: the intelligent priority support is still a TODO :-)
> 
> El mar, 03-06-2003 a las 20:15, Seth Nickell escribió:
> 
> <snip>
> 
> > Most people don't care about the bootup sequence. They care about
> > whether the service is running or not. A single checkbox would do just
> > fine. It would be especially nice if when you checked the box, the
> > service actually started and when you unchecked it, the service stopped
> > (and of course, this also effects the "runlevel" settings... however
> > RH's setup tool does it). It would be even cooler if there was some way
> > to check if the service was running (for services which support this,
> > like atalk, httpd, etc) and only show the checkbox as checked if it was.
> > 
> > This gets rid of the distinction between "service runs at bootup" and
> > "service is running".
> > 
> > -Seth
> > 
> > 
> _______________________________________________
> desktop-devel-list mailing list
> desktop-devel-list@gnome.org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
-- 
Mark Finlay <sisob@eircom.net>

_______________________________________________
setup-tool-hackers maillist  -  setup-tool-hackers@lists.ximian.com
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/setup-tool-hackers