Re: Sawfish 1.8.0 and Fedora

>> I use sawfish on Fedora (have done ver since it was the Gnome default. If
>> the
>> packages could be added to one of the standard repositories, that would be
>> wonderful.
> +1, since... RH7.3. :-)

+1, since RH 7.0 :)

I have no idea how to get the sawfish/rep-gtk/librep rpms into the repos but that would be the best solution. Compiling
sawfish has been notoriously non-trivial (currently involves editing
header files "rep/xxxxx.h -> xxxx.h" on Fedora for example, so getting
binary packages into the repos would be a great
usability plus.


Psss, psss, put it down! -

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]