On Saturday 09 April 2011 08:58:09 Ian Zimmerman wrote: > >> Can we get this right soon, or am I doomed to keep my own private > >> debian packages forever? > > Christopher> see git commit 285be02d989aa4f6b7038a9420d505ec08e36d99, > Christopher> bumped soname from 9.5.0 to 9.6.0. You still need to > Christopher> rebuild, as it's an ABI not an API change. (besides we're > Christopher> already at 0.91.1) > > Sorry, No Good. > > The _major_ version (the 9) has to change for a backwards incompatible > ABI change. That's what the settings I gave in my post would do. > > (The middle version increases for ABI "widenings" when you > add new functions and variables but leave existing ones untouched. > Please see the libtool info manual for more details.) > > Then we also have to change the name of the debian package to something > like librep16, where 16 is the new major version. Now I see... you're right, so it's time for 10.0.0 > I am already part way through sorting out the mess, I can let you pull > my git tree when I'm done. Or do you want to give me commit access on > tuxfamily? I do it all on a branch, of course. After you registered at TF, tell me your username. Chris
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.