Re: RFC: librep without .la files, rep-gtk combined

On Saturday 02 April 2011 15:08:48 Kim B. Heino wrote:
> > > While trying to get Sawfish into Fedora I had to remove libtool's
> > > .la files from rpm.  By doing that everything broke.
> > 
> > You *might* be able to get the packages approved as-is, if you pointed
> > out that...
> I rather not do that. IMHO, current way to use *.la is a kludge and
> should be fixed.
> > so removing the *.la files shouldn't be that painful--as
> > you've discovered.
> Yes, it was actually quite easy. I'm still running the patched version
> without problems. If you or somebody else want to test the patches or
> comment about the spec files:
> Files dated 02-Apr-2011 are the patched versions.
> Speaking of Fedora, librep is now approved. I asked to wait before
> continuing to rep-gtk - this la-problem has to be solved first.

I'll check the patches this weekend. BTW: there's no sawfish-pager package.


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]