On Saturday 02 April 2011 15:08:48 Kim B. Heino wrote: > > > While trying to get Sawfish into Fedora I had to remove libtool's > > > .la files from rpm. By doing that everything broke. > > > > You *might* be able to get the packages approved as-is, if you pointed > > out that... > > I rather not do that. IMHO, current way to use *.la is a kludge and > should be fixed. > > > so removing the *.la files shouldn't be that painful--as > > you've discovered. > > Yes, it was actually quite easy. I'm still running the patched version > without problems. If you or somebody else want to test the patches or > comment about the spec files: > > http://b.bbbs.net/sawfish/ > > Files dated 02-Apr-2011 are the patched versions. > > > Speaking of Fedora, librep is now approved. I asked to wait before > continuing to rep-gtk - this la-problem has to be solved first. I'll check the patches this weekend. BTW: there's no sawfish-pager package. Chris
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.