Re: sawfish 1.6.3 can't compile sawfish.wm.util.prompt
- From: Harald van Dijk <harald gigawatt nl>
- To: General discussion about sawfish wm <sawfish-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: sawfish 1.6.3 can't compile sawfish.wm.util.prompt
- Date: Sun, 23 May 2010 21:50:12 +0159
On 23/05/10 21:33, Harald van Dijk wrote:
On 23/05/10 16:41, Jeremy Hankins wrote:
I haven't been able to replicate this, and it doesn't make a whole lot
of sense to me. A file shouldn't have to be opened from itself in order
to compile it, and I can't see where a (setq foo bar) would generate a
void-value error on foo.
As far as I could tell, if the file is not opened from itself, the
defvar is only evaluated after the setq, because the setq is part of
an eval-when-compile. (open)ing prompt.jl from within itself ensures
the defvar is processed earlier. I am not sure why you are not seeing
this, I will try to track this down further. For reference, I started
the build with librep 0.90.5, rep-gtk 0.90.2, and sawfish 1.6.2
installed, no git snapshots. And I do not think this should matter,
but it's happening on a fairly standard x86_64 linux system.
Using a test rep file test.jl:
(define-structure test
(export test-var)
(open rep)
(defvar test-var nil)
(eval-when-compile (setq test-var t)))
a second test file test2.jl:
(require 'test)
(setq test-var t)
and compiling these via
rm -f *.jlc && rep --batch compiler -f compile-batch test2.jl test.jl
all is fine. Compiling these via
rm -f *.jlc && rep --batch compiler -f compile-batch test.jl test2.jl
results in
*** Unbound variable: test-var
()
sawfish doesn't use compile-batch, it uses compile-lib-batch. Depending
on the order used, it may or may not have opened prompt.jl by pure luck
before turning to compile it.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]