Re: quotation question + good lisp doc

Am Sun, 14 Feb 2010 10:26:32 +0100
schrieb Christopher Roy Bratusek <zanghar freenet de>:

> Am Sat, 13 Feb 2010 23:14:20 +0100
> schrieb Christoph Ruegge <cruegge gmx de>:
> > Hi. The attached version works for me. But I think the function should
> > probably be called "define-cycle-or-exec", just "cycle-or-exec" may be
> > confusing. Additionally, cycle-or-exec-backend makes it possible to
> > use functions for `prog', but in that case `prog' should not be used
> > in the constructed names of the cycling commands (it maybe shouldn't
> > be used for generic shell command strings as well...)
> Thanks. -1 for my lisp knowledge. I'm not sure about the final name...
> define-cycle-or-exec-command-pair would be the most correct, but it's too long.
> cycle-or-exec-pair? define-cycle-or-exec? cycle-or-exec? Hmm...
> Chris

Updated version with `name' arguement and examples.


Re[20]: flame
Gesendet von energyman am Sa, 2. Jun 2007 um 16:14

Jaguar? Der häufiger in die Werkstatt muß, als zum Tanken. Jaguar,
die für jede Stunde fahrt 3 Stunden Pflege brauchen?

Also du hättest kaum einen besseren Vergleich finden können.

Allerdings denke ich, daß GNOME doch mehr einem Lada gleicht.

Attachment: cycle-or-exec.jl
Description: Binary data

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]