Re: Maybe we should revert 'Iconify' patch.
- From: Teika Kazura <teika lavabit com>
- To: sawfish-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Maybe we should revert 'Iconify' patch.
- Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2009 20:53:47 +0900 (JST)
Sorry, a correction.
Teika Kazura wrote:
> On the other hand, 'yes' works. Try both cases against "xclock"
> with/without "-iconic". Run it before sawfish / run it and restart
> sawfish.
This does *not* prove anything. Look at the pre-patched code:
if (w->wmhints && w->wmhints->flags & StateHint
&& w->wmhints->initial_state == IconicState)
{
rep_call_lisp1 (module_symbol_value (rep_VAL (&iconify_mod),
Qiconify_window), rep_VAL(w));
}
There's no 'else' clause.
I'll invesigate this issue. I think I can derive the conclusion in a week.
> First, there had not been a bug. Putting 'Iconify -> no' in the
> configurator GUI is likely to do *nothing*.
This *is* a bug, my common sense tells so;)
Anyway, a good summary of this problem is required. Wait for a moment.
Teika kazura
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]