Re: Porting rep-gtk to gtk+3

Am Dienstag, den 02.09.2008, 20:12 +0200 schrieb Andrea Vettorello:
> On Tue, Sep 2, 2008 at 4:34 PM, Christopher Bratusek <nano-master gmx de> wrote:
> [...]
> > if gconf stays our config-database, we could make a rep-gconf, couldn't
> > we?
> >
> GConf is going to be replaced by GSetting (or a similar sounding
> name), but I wouldn't rely on GConf to store Sawfish configurations.

I didn't mean to switch sawfish's config to GSetting, but to provide a
binding, so that it _could_ be used by scripts or other rep-gtk apps.

> IIRC the GTK+ librep binding was done using Guile as an example. I've
> looked at the latest Guile version, released 8 weeks ago (
> ), but reading the
> changelogs I'm not sure to which version of the GTK+ library the
> guile-gtk wrapper is based (at least GTK+ 2.10, and
> seems to confirm it).
> There is a guile-cairo too that can be used as an example... ^__^

And if guile gets ported to gtk+3 ... even better :)


GNOME/Sawfish rule!

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]