Re: librep 0.17.1 - using rep directory under share and for bin
- From: ritz <khadgaray gmail com>
- To: General discussion about sawfish wm <sawfish-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: librep 0.17.1 - using rep directory under share and for bin
- Date: Sat, 04 Oct 2008 13:37:49 +0530
Hello
On Sat, 2008-10-04 at 01:53 +0200, GSR - FR wrote:
> Hi,
> khadgaray gmail com (2008-10-04 at 0445.45 +0530):
> > Hello
> >
> > On Mon, 2008-09-08 at 17:15 +0530, ritz wrote:
> > > Hello
> > >
> > > On Thu, 2008-08-14 at 17:57 +0200, Christopher Bratusek wrote:
> > > > Hi all,
> > > >
> > > > librep 0.17.1 and rep-gtk 0.18.1 are finally out!
> > > >
> > > > Release Announcement:
> > > >
> > > > http://www.nanolx.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=59
> >
> > fedora package reviewer[1] believe that rep is rather too short for a
> > name[2] for use in share and as a binary. What is the opinion of the
> > developer in this regard ?
>
> It means read, eval, print, maybe Fedora could use read-eval-print. ;]
> It was fine with rep in RH times, with rpms named like librep,
> rep-gtk, rep-gtk-libglade, librep-devel or rep-gtk-gnome, and commands
> like rep or rep-remote. Other distros, when having collisions, just
> rename locally and rep does not seem to be a problem currently in
> those other distros (Debian has ack, Kanji code converter, and
> ack-grep, specialized grepper, while originally both are ack). Was rep
> name taken over by something else in the meantime it was dropped from
> RH/FC?
Not yet. I do not believe this name to be generic, or in conflict with
any other project.
/me fingers crossed
>
> GSR
>
--
Ritesh Khadgaray
Ph: +919970164885
Desktop LinuX N Stuff, RHCE
Software Maintenance Engineer, Pune, Red Hat
ॐ मणि पद्मे हूँ
Eat Right, Exercise, Die Anyway.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]