On Sun, Jul 01, 2007 at 03:41:05PM -0400, Robert Personen wrote: > >1. make a new sawfish release from current SVN, name it 2.0 since it > > is a release after many years. > > > I would have to agree with what others have already said, there does > not seem to be enough changes in SVN or from other sources to warrant > a 2.0 release. I would say a 1.3.1 release from SVN if it is stable > and then maybe a 1.4 release including any other patches that are > still out there. Me too ;-) SVN trunk so stable that it's what we release for Debian. (Well, Debian etch was released with a CVS checkout, but that's just because it was frozen before gnome finished its migration to svn. The only other changes to date are translations.) Thus, I completely agree a 1.3.1 from there is the right thing.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature