On Feb 6, 2005, at 3:57 PM, John Harper wrote:
On Feb 6, 2005, at 2:57 PM, Michal Maruška wrote:i think, that XFlush is not enough. XSync is needed, b/c X server could firstI don't think that Xsync will make any difference here, the flush ensures that the wm process has ungrabbed by the time the menu process attempts to grab.serve the requests of the sawfish-menu client, and deny it the grab.
on second thoughts, I take that back, it relies on the X server processing requests in the order they're flushed, which isn't necessarily true. Does this patch work?
Attachment:
patch
Description: Binary data