Re: mediaexport: rygel shares are mess when viewed from a 2013 panasonic viera

[Julian Sikorski <belegdol gmail com>]

W dniu 24.01.2015 o 14:22, Jens Georg pisze:
> On Sa, 2015-01-24 at 13:39 +0100, Julian Sikorski wrote:
> > W dniu 24.01.2015 o 12:57, Jens Georg pisze:
> > > > W dniu 30.06.2014 o 19:10, Jens Georg pisze:
> > > > > Can you provide a network dump so that we can see what the tv actually
> > > > > requests?
> > > >
> > > > I just re-tested with 0.24.2 and the problem is still there. I have
> > > > tried using wireshark to get something, but I am not sure how useful it
> > > > will be as I am absolute wireshark newbie. Please let me know if I can
> > > > do anything else. Thank you for all the help in advance!
> > >
> > > So, Jussi was right. If you go for the "by metadata", the devices does a
> > > recursive browse and fails to interpret the refId (which indicates that
> > > this is kind of a symbolic link to another item on the server), hence
> > > the duplicate (UPnP has a mechanism to say "this is item with id foo
> > > which is actually a reference to item with id bar")
> >
> > Thanks so much for looking into this! Do you think this is something
> > that could be worked around on rygel side?
> >
> > > Did you also provide a trace for the normal browse
> >
> > The 2nd file, unsorted.pcapng, should be the normal, per-filename browse
> > trace. The issue with that one is that the files are in seemingly random
> > order. This makes looking for particular files and folders difficult:
> > https://belegdol.fedorapeople.org/rygel/IMG_20150124_133618.jpg
> > Please let me know if you were referring to something else and I will be
> > more than happy to provide it.
>
> Sorry, found it. Yeah, same. It asks for sort order
>
> +upnp:class,+dc:date
>
> We could possibly work around that, but I'm not sure whether the device
> would like that.
Thank you for this pointer. Now I at least know what the device is
supposed to do. It is true that within particular folders, the files are
sorted by date in an ascending order, which makes sense I guess.
However, the folders themselves do not appear to be sorted by creation
time. I tried using
$ ls -t
to see whether the order would be the same, but it is not. Where is
rygel taking the dates from?

Best regards,
Julian