RE: rygel render problems

["Liu, Albert" <msliu qca qualcomm com>]

Thanks for your quick response.
I would capture the packet log later.
Here answered you questions.

- What kind of interface is Rygel running on (WiFi vs. Ethernet)
[Albert] Running on Ethernet inteface
- Which versions of GSSDP and GUPnP are you using?
[Albert] GSSDP: 0.7.2, GUPnP:0.13.5, GUPnP-AV: 0.5.9
- Which Android controlpoint are you using?
[Albert] I am using skifta application which include DMC functions in it.

Thanks,
Albert
-----Original Message-----
From: Jens Georg [mailto:mail jensge org] 
Sent: Monday, July 30, 2012 8:28 PM
To: Liu, Albert
Cc: rygel-list gnome org
Subject: Re: rygel render problems

On Mo, 2012-07-30 at 11:56 +0000, Liu, Albert wrote:
> Hi Jens,
> 
>  
> 
> I am developing an audio render project based on Rygel.
> 
> I find some problems while running it, could you give me some 
> suggestion.
> 
>  
> 
> 1.     In my test, if I start rygel first then I could not find my
> render device in my android phone.
> 
> But if I start to find the DLNA devices on my android phone and then 
> start Rygel, I could find it in my android phone.
> 
> Do you know what’s the problem of it ?


 - What kind of interface is Rygel running on (WiFi vs. Ethernet)
 - Which versions of GSSDP and GUPnP are you using?
 - Which Android controlpoint are you using?

There might be several reasons for this. If the order of starting is important, it's most likely that the device either did not receive the M-SEARCH responses or did not like them, but had no problems to receive/like the initial service announcement. Hard to say without a packet capture.

> 2.     Do you know whether Rygel support password protection ?
> 
> We want to implement a way to protect our DLNA render.
> When someone try to control our DLNA render, the user will be prompted 
> to request enter the password.
> 
> Does Rygel support this kind of function ?
> 
> Could you give us some suggestions how to implement it ?

No, it does not. You would need to hook somewhere in the UPnP callbacks and trigger the entry for the user I suppose.

Wouldn't it make more sense to allow the controlling instances individually as e.g. WMP does?