Re: [Rhythmbox-devel] Rhythmbox archive

[Виктор Кожухаров <vkojouharov gmail com>]

So that's why the merge branch hasn't been updated in a while. Can
anyone provide the instructions for pulling it from gnome cvs?

On Thu, 2005-06-02 at 10:20 +0100, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> On Sat, 2005-05-28 at 17:04 +0200, Øivind Hoel wrote:
> > Which brings me to asking where Walters is hiding?
> 
> Well, Colin is very busy with other stuff. As you've seen in the past
> couple of months, other people are interested in keeping development
> going.
> 
> The way we've (Colin and myself) pushed this first is the tla archive
> has been closed for upstream Rhythmbox development. Development is now
> done in GNOME CVS (as in the good ol' days), and we'll start pushing in
> new features and bug fixes.
> 
> Could everyone with patches pending in some devel branch of some kind
> either:
> - file a bug and attach patches for new features
> - send small build/compilation/obvious patches to this list with a small
> explanation of the problems it fixes.
> 
> I'm willing to review the patches, and I hope Christophe will be able to
> help out as well. I think we'll get a new release out in the next couple
> of weeks.
> 
> Let's get cracking.
> 
> Cheers
> 
> > On 5/28/05, Jaap Haitsma <jaap haitsma org> wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > > 
> > > Is there a reason why the rhythmbox central archive
> > > <http://web.rhythmbox.org/arch/2004> is so outdated? Last patch is from
> > > January 2005
> > > 
> > > I personally like to use jhbuild to try out bleeding edge software and
> > > jhbuild is currently using that outdated archive.
> > > 
> > > I know that there are multiple archives of people which contain more
> > > recent patches. E.g. I read overhere [1] that it was better to use
> > > Archive: olemke core-dump info--2005
> > > Branch:  rhythmbox--merge--0.9
> > > http://arch.core-dump.info/archive
> > > 
> > > But how do I know as a newbie which archive I should use? The above
> > > archive for instance is not listed on the website.
> > > 
> > > I might be missing something because I'm not so familiar with arch
> > > development, but I guess it will difficult to do a release now. Because
> > > you have all this archives with different features and patches, which
> > > have not been approved by the maintainer of rhythmbox.
> > > 
> > > It seems to me it would be better to commit changes faster to the main
> > > archive. These changes would get more testing and you don't need to
> > > postpone all the decisions until just before a release.
> > > 
> > > Cheers,
> > > 
> > > Jaap
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > [1] http://mail.gnome.org/archives/rhythmbox-devel/2005-May/msg00148.html
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > rhythmbox-devel mailing list
> > > rhythmbox-devel gnome org
> > > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/rhythmbox-devel
> > > 
> > 
> > 
> ---
> Bastien Nocera <hadess hadess net> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> rhythmbox-devel mailing list
> rhythmbox-devel gnome org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/rhythmbox-devel