On Mon, 2005-08-22 at 13:39 -0400, Colin Walters wrote: > Isn't it required for GNOME 2.12? Ok, I found the earlier thread where we discussed this, and we concluded GNOME 2.10. Sorry about responding without thinking...it just sucks to see patches being held because of this. It does appear that GNOME 2.10 uses D-BUS 0.23; so if we're actually targeting 2.10, anything depending on D-BUS like HAL will be problematic. How about this as a compromise - we make sure it compiles on 2.10, even if it doesn't have all the features like the iPod reading? Then if we want later we can try to add conditional support. We really need someone with a 2.10 system to volunteer to do the coding and testing if we're going to try to support it.
Description: This is a digitally signed message part