Re: [Rhythmbox-devel] status

I'm running RB 0.5.3 on 2.6.0-test6 kernel RedHat 9 using ALSA.
Seems fine to me...

Jim Myers  

On Mon, 2003-10-06 at 22:10, jorge o. castro wrote:
> I just built the CVS tonight, hopefully I'm not missing too much from
> the arch tree.
> Colin Walters wrote:
> > * Sorting
> Holy smokes dude. The difference is like night and day. Awesome!
> > In light of how fast --mainline is progressing, I'm considering just
> > skipping 0.5.4 and going straight to 0.6.0.
> > 
> > So, opinions/comments/questions?
> I agree with Douglas on this. I've been playing with it for about an
> hour and I think the performance improvements with the library are worth
> skipping a 0.5.4, and 0.5.3 isn't really too bad in the meantime.
> Although I've only been playing with it for a short time it feels much
> snappier and I haven't had any crashes with it so far. (I had one X
> crash but I don't think it was rb related) In fact it feels like at the
> rate it's improving that you're already well past the hump to get a .6
> out the door.
> Is anyone else running rb on a 2.6 kernel? In case anyone is wondering I
> haven't had any issues with rb/gstreamer with it so far, it's a great
> combo. :)
> 2 cents from a clueless rb fan. :p
> -jorge
> _______________________________________________
> rhythmbox-devel mailing list

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]