Re: [Rhythmbox-devel] Patch: spelling correction and rewording indruid

[Bastien Nocera <hadess hadess net>]

On Fri, 2003-08-08 at 13:02, James Kahn wrote:
> On Fri, 2003-08-08 at 23:56, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> > On Fri, 2003-08-08 at 12:49, James Kahn wrote:
> > > The previous wording about adding music to the library sounded a bit
> > > clumsy.
> > 
> > > -You may choose to skip this step; instead, you 
> > > -can add music to your library at any point later.
> > > +Its okay choose to skip this step; you can always add music to your library later.
> > 
> > Urgh, that's hardly correct spelling or grammar. And it's also a bit too
> > informal.
> 
> Argh, how could I overlook missing a word -  I should've got more than 4
> hours of sleep last night.
> 
> The problem I had with it before is that the druid was phrased as if it
> was giving the user permission to skip the step, rather than the
> choice.  I also thought that it was a bit too formal.
> 
> Patch again, omitted word replaced.  I prefer the more relaxed tone.

> -You may choose to skip this step; instead, you 
> -can add music to your library at any point later.
> +Its okay to choose to skip this step; you can always add music to your library later.

s/Its/It's/

And I don't think that we should be using informal language in
interactions with the users.

-- 
/Bastien Nocera
http://hadess.net

#2  0x4205a2cc in printf ("Oh my %s\n", preferred_deity) from
/lib/i686/libc.so.6 printf ("Oh my %s\n", preferred_deity);
Segmentation fault