Re: [Rhythmbox-devel] State Of The Rhythmbox]

Bastien Nocera a écrit :
> On Sun, 2003-08-03 at 20:14, Colin Walters wrote:
>>On Sun, 2003-08-03 at 13:02, Yann Rouillard wrote:
>>>Colin Walters a écrit :
>>> > Mmm, fun.  Well, since a lot of people will not really want to upgrade
>>>>their GTK+ anyways, I guess we're stuck with forking GtkTreeView.  I'll
>>>>do this sometime in the next few days (unless someone else beats me to
>>>>it! :))
>>>Here are the necessary files to include to have our own
>>I asked this of Yann in private, but I'll ask here too in case anyone
>>else knows: will defining our own versions of the gtk_tree_model_sort_*
>>cause any problems?  Since presumably then there will be multiple
>>definitions of the symbol linked in.
>>What would make me the most comfortable is to rename the whole thing to
>>rb_temp_tree_model_sort.  I know it's kind of painful, but...
> No, shouldn't be any problems. In totem, I have the gnome-vfs
> authentication dialog which is also present in libgnomeui 2.3. Totem
> works fine on this platform, and uses the version inside its tree.

Ok, so no painful renaming task !
Anyway my previous patch I for configure was not perfect, this new one 
should work fine (the configure option is now 
Rhythmbox compiled with this workaround works fine for me but it would 
be nice if other people could test it to be sure it doesn't cause bugs.


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]