Re: [Rhythmbox-devel] State Of The Rhythmbox]

On Sun, 2003-08-03 at 20:14, Colin Walters wrote:
> On Sun, 2003-08-03 at 13:02, Yann Rouillard wrote:
> > Colin Walters a écrit :
> >  > Mmm, fun.  Well, since a lot of people will not really want to upgrade
> > > their GTK+ anyways, I guess we're stuck with forking GtkTreeView.  I'll
> > > do this sometime in the next few days (unless someone else beats me to
> > > it! :))
> > 
> > Here are the necessary files to include to have our own
> > gtktreemodelsort. 
> I asked this of Yann in private, but I'll ask here too in case anyone
> else knows: will defining our own versions of the gtk_tree_model_sort_*
> cause any problems?  Since presumably then there will be multiple
> definitions of the symbol linked in.
> What would make me the most comfortable is to rename the whole thing to
> rb_temp_tree_model_sort.  I know it's kind of painful, but...

No, shouldn't be any problems. In totem, I have the gnome-vfs
authentication dialog which is also present in libgnomeui 2.3. Totem
works fine on this platform, and uses the version inside its tree.

Bastien Nocera <>

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]