On Thu, 2003-07-31 at 17:15, Jakub Steiner wrote: > V P? 01. 08. 2003 v 00:04, Bob Smith píše: > > > There's on going debate as to what to call it. Rip is a fairly geeky > > term which non geeks might have a problem understanding. Import is > > Apple's consumers aren't very geeky overall and Rip, Mix & Burn are > terms everyone is pretty familiar with. But I'm fine with extract after > all. It's just that it feels more foreign than rip actually ;) (I'm bet > even for non-geeks) > Ah this is true. You always have to realize that someone will not know the terms used in a field like ours. My take is call it extract. It sounds better then Rip. As to using SJ for this, I can concur with that. Another thought also comes to mind, and that is writing a burning/ripping library for RB to use. Maybe an option can be added to SJ that will tell RB (by gconf key)? to regenerate the library with the new songs. I think we need to focus on our feature freeze bugs before we get too into adding more. I think the Extract and Burn options should come at the same time. I would say, after this feature freeze, but also after say album cover display and id3 tags editing (If these are indeed planned features). Just my 2 and 1/2 cents to the world. -- Sean Harshbarger | "Only two things are infinite, harshy@dersoldat.org | the universe and human stupidity, http://www.dersoldat.org | and I'm not sure about the former." http://coaster.sf.net | - Albert Einstein (1879-1955) Key fingerprint = 086A AA96 51DD D84D 3E64 1B26 778F 2335 C828 E736
This is a digitally signed message part