Re: gtk changes in the jhbuild moduleset

On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 11:47 AM, Simon McVittie
<simon mcvittie collabora co uk> wrote:
On Fri, 2016-10-07 at 11:14 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote:
On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 6:36 AM, Bastien Nocera <hadess hadess net>
Which would mean nothing called "gtk+" in the modulesets? Why not
either gtk 3.x or gtk 4.x with that name?

I'd expect the "gtk+" module to build GTK+ 4.x ("the latest").

I have no strong opinion on this. Not having gtk+ in the moduleset
doesn't seem like a big deal to me. The + in the name is a bit
awkward, tbh.

Losing the gtk+ module would mean third-party modulesets are forced to
make a decision on whether they want gtk3 or gtk4, which seems like it
might be desirable?

I ended up naming the modules gtk+-3 and gtk+, and I switched all
existing dependencies in the moduleset to gtk+-3 for now. 3rd party
modules will still have to make a decision. We can change the name to
gtk+-4 if that is preferred.

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]