Re: Death of gnome-common



On Sun, 2015-06-21 at 17:56 -0700, Jasper St. Pierre wrote:
On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 9:05 AM, Philip Withnall <
philip tecnocode co uk> wrote:
See literally the first migration item on
https://wiki.gnome.org/Projects/GnomeCommon/Migration

tl;dr: You can open-code it with essentially:
        aclocal --install || exit 1
        glib-gettextize --force --copy || exit 1
        gtkdocize --copy || exit 1
        intltoolize --force --copy --automake || exit 1
        autoreconf --verbose --force --install -Wno-portability || 
exit
        1

(removing the technologies which you don’t use).

Er, I meant to reply to this earlier, but forgot to, I guess. Is 
there
a simpler thing than this, because I still like ". gnome-autogen.sh"
more. Seems much simpler.

There is not. You are welcome to continue using gnome-autogen.sh if you
want to keep a dependency around purely for a build-time shell script.
Or you could copy gnome-autogen.sh into your project. We are planning
no further changes to gnome-autogen.sh upstream.

Note that using gnome-autogen.sh isn’t actually as simple as that;
you’re supposed to set various environment variables indicating your
dependencies. So a realistic invocation is more like:

    #!/bin/sh
    srcdir=`dirname $0`
    test -z "$srcdir" && srcdir=.

    PKG_NAME=libgdata

    (test -f $srcdir/configure.ac) || {
        echo "**Error**: Directory "\`$srcdir\'" does not look like the
    top-level $PKG_NAME directory"
        exit 1
    }

    which gnome-autogen.sh || {
            echo "You need to install gnome-common from GNOME Git"
            exit 1
    }

    REQUIRED_PKG_CONFIG_VERSION=0.17.1 REQUIRED_AUTOMAKE_VERSION=1.13
    REQUIRED_GTK_DOC_VERSION=1.14 . gnome-autogen.sh "$@"

Philip

On Thu, 2015-05-28 at 08:43 -0700, Jasper St. Pierre wrote:
What about the gnome-autogen.sh script? Most of my autogen.sh 
files
just run ". gnome-autogen.sh"

On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 6:55 AM, Daniel Mustieles García
<daniel mustieles gmail com> wrote:
Ok, thanks for clarifying! :)

2015-05-28 14:40 GMT+02:00 Philip Withnall <
philip tecnocode co uk>:

It’s already sort of tracked as part of the ModernAutotools 
goal,
although that one lost momentum a while ago, so its status 
needs to be
reset:

https://wiki.gnome.org/Initiatives/GnomeGoals/ModernAutotools

However, since there’s no flag-day-changeover for gnome
-common, I’m not
sure it’s necessary to have a GNOME Goal. Maintainers hate 
touching
build systems unnecessarily.

Philip

On Thu, 2015-05-28 at 14:03 +0200, Daniel Mustieles García 
wrote:
Would this make sense to create a GNOME Goal[1] to 
ease/track the
change?

[1]

https://wiki.gnome.org/action/show/Initiatives/GnomeGoals?a
ction=show&redirect=GnomeGoals


2015-05-28 13:47 GMT+02:00 Philip Withnall <
philip tecnocode co uk>:
        Hi all,

        This cycle, Dave and I are planning for the last 
ever release
        of
        gnome-common. A lot of its macros for deprecated 
technologies
        (scrollkeeper?!) have been removed, and the 
remainder of its
        macros have
        found better replacements in autoconf-archive[1], 
where they
        can be used
        by everyone, not just GNOME.

        We plan to make one last release, and people are 
welcome to
        depend on it
        for as long as they like. However, if you want new 
hotness,
        port to the
        autoconf-archive versions of the macros; but please 
do it in
        your own
        time. There will be no flag day port away from 
gnome-common.

        Note that, for example, porting to 
AX_COMPILER_FLAGS is
        valuable, but
        will probably require fixing a number of new 
compiler warnings
        in your
        code due to increased warning flags. We hope this 
will make
        your code
        better in the long run.

        There’s a migration guide here:

        
https://wiki.gnome.org/Projects/GnomeCommon/Migration

        We’ve tried to make the transition as easy and 
smooth as
        possible, but
        there will inevitably be hiccups. Please let me 
know about
        anything
        which breaks or doesn’t make sense. First person to 
complain
        about
        -Wswitch-enum gets a prize.


        For developers
        ---

        When building from a tarball of a module which uses 
the new
        macros, you
        will no longer need gnome-common installed. 
(Although you may
        not have
        needed it before.)

        When building from git, you will need m4-common[2] 
or
        autoconf-archive[1] installed.

        JHBuild bootstrap installs m4-common automatically, 
as does
        gnome-continuous; so you don’t need to worry about 
that.

        For packagers
        ---

        In the 3.14.0 release, gnome-common installed some 
early
        versions of the
        autoconf-archive macros which conflicted with what
        autoconf-archive
        itself installs. It now has a --[with|
        without]-autoconf-archive
        configure option to control this. We suggest that 
all
        packagers pass
        --with-autoconf-archive if (and only if) autoconf
-archive is
        packaged on
        the distribution. See bug #747920[3].

        m4-common *must not* be packaged. See its 
README[2]. m4-common
        is
        essentially a caching subset of autoconf-archive.

        For continuous integrators
        ---

        Modules which use the new AX_COMPILER_FLAGS macro 
gain a new
        standard
        --disable-Werror configure flag, which should be 
used in CI
        systems (and
        any other system where spurious compiler warnings 
should _not_
        cause
        total failure of a build) to disable -Werror. The 
idea here is
        that
        -Werror is enabled by default when building from 
git, and
        disabled by
        default when building from release tarballs and in 
buildbots.

        Philip

        [1]: http://www.gnu.org/software/autoconf-archive/
        [2]: https://github.com/desrt/m4-common/
        [3]: 
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=747920

        _______________________________________________
        desktop-devel-list mailing list
        desktop-devel-list gnome org
        
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list





_______________________________________________
desktop-devel-list mailing list
desktop-devel-list gnome org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list






Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]