Re: Fwd: Re: Bug#727708: init system coupling etc.



Olav Vitters wrote:

We should make clear what our position is. Reasonable demands are fine.
Going to us because init systems are lacking is plain weird. I was very
friendly in my reply, but it needs to be said that going to GNOME for
init system development is weird.

My proposal would be to engage with the Debian GNOME team, rather than
trying to address the whole project.


I've spoken to 3 Debian GNOME package maintainers during FOSDEM. They
said they don't speak up much, they prefer just doing their thing and
making GNOME work. My intention to Debian is that they should focus on
providing a good experience. Irrespective if we are a default or not.
Positive cooperation, because if being a default results is why they
cooperate or demand things, then that is the wrong reason.

I believe we agree on this, we want GNOME to shine, and the Debian
GNOME team does work with that goal of making it shine in Debian,
that's why I believe in them, and prefer leaving them the role of
addressing internal Debian issues.



        Fred


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]