Re: jhbuild continuous integration testing: status and plans

[Vadim Rutkovsky <vrutkovs redhat com>]

Hey,

Matthias, could you explain more on gtester faults or propose alternatives?

Just for explanation - I proposed this change as gtester produces nice html report and XML output, which, 
being converted to JUnit XML, can be used to collect stats of failing tests - this can be used to spot 
unstable tests. 

Note, that this feature is not essential (EDS bug doesn't replace old 'make check' system), but might be very 
useful.

Thanks,
  Vadim

----- Original Message -----
From: "Matthias Clasen" <matthias clasen gmail com>
To: "Tristan Van Berkom" <tvb gnome org>
Cc: "GNOME release team" <release-team gnome org>, "desktop-devel-list" <desktop-devel-list gnome org>
Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2013 12:07:27 PM
Subject: Re: jhbuild continuous integration testing: status and plans

On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 6:54 AM, Tristan Van Berkom <tvb gnome org> wrote:


> Did I miss some important information (i.e. is this already done somewhere
> at least partially and I'm not aware of it) ?

I'd really rather get off gtester - as you've noticed, it is somewhat
lacking, and the Makefile integration is really not great. See
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=692125 for my attempt at
this.
_______________________________________________
desktop-devel-list mailing list
desktop-devel-list gnome org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list