Re: jhbuild continuous integration testing: status and plans
- From: Vadim Rutkovsky <vrutkovs redhat com>
- To: Matthias Clasen <matthias clasen gmail com>
- Cc: GNOME release team <release-team gnome org>, desktop-devel-list <desktop-devel-list gnome org>, Tristan Van Berkom <tvb gnome org>
- Subject: Re: jhbuild continuous integration testing: status and plans
- Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2013 15:30:05 -0400 (EDT)
Hey,
Matthias, could you explain more on gtester faults or propose alternatives?
Just for explanation - I proposed this change as gtester produces nice html report and XML output, which,
being converted to JUnit XML, can be used to collect stats of failing tests - this can be used to spot
unstable tests.
Note, that this feature is not essential (EDS bug doesn't replace old 'make check' system), but might be very
useful.
Thanks,
Vadim
----- Original Message -----
From: "Matthias Clasen" <matthias clasen gmail com>
To: "Tristan Van Berkom" <tvb gnome org>
Cc: "GNOME release team" <release-team gnome org>, "desktop-devel-list" <desktop-devel-list gnome org>
Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2013 12:07:27 PM
Subject: Re: jhbuild continuous integration testing: status and plans
On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 6:54 AM, Tristan Van Berkom <tvb gnome org> wrote:
Did I miss some important information (i.e. is this already done somewhere
at least partially and I'm not aware of it) ?
I'd really rather get off gtester - as you've noticed, it is somewhat
lacking, and the Makefile integration is really not great. See
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=692125 for my attempt at
this.
_______________________________________________
desktop-devel-list mailing list
desktop-devel-list gnome org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]