Re: Announcement/RFC: jhbuild continuous integration testing

On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 11:23:52AM +0100, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> On Wed, 2013-02-13 at 10:59 +0100, Olav Vitters wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 06:53:17AM +0100, Martin Pitt wrote:
> > > The main issue that I see with this is that it's much harder to filter
> > > away/opt out, so it requires some broader consensus that we want to do
> > > this. We can still add a module blacklist if needed, though.
> > 
> > I think build issues should be filed as Bugzilla bugs. At most we maybe
> > want to set some keyword / status whiteboard. But I guess the summary
> > would be consistent and people will quickly learn of it.
> They should be filed as Bugzilla bugs *after a timeout*. We already see
> build failures on ostree popping up on the #testable channel, and those
> are usually fixed in a timely manner.

Hmm, makes sense. Maybe start of small?


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]