Re: r-t meeting (topics)

[Piñeiro <apinheiro igalia com>]

On 10/12/2012 11:27 PM, Andre Klapper wrote:
> [More potential topics added at the bottom]
>
> On Thu, 2012-10-04 at 13:04 +0200, Andre Klapper wrote:
>> Potential topics (feel free to add/edit/comment):
>>       * 3.5/3.6 review: What worked out, what didn't?
>>       * Potential r-t membership changes
>>       * Release assignments for 3.7.x
>>       * First comments on 3.8 feature proposals?:
>>         https://live.gnome.org/ThreePointSeven/Features
>>
>> Not sure if these are r-t issues, but also something to sort out:
>> * Is changing gsettings strings covered by freeze break or not?
>>   https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gnome-i18n/2012-September/msg00181.html
>> * WebKitGTK+ has failed to produce a valid POT file (for L10N) for 
>>   two years now. This makes Epiphany (and GNOME) look bad.
>>   The problem is somewhere between webkit and intltool. See e.g.
>>   https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=67580
>>   https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=81969
>>   https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45321
>>   I can provide more pointers if needed.
> * Security bug reports: There's no real policy and clarity how to
> escalate. Document who to contact and what to do in Bugzilla (e.g.
> restrict access? Though once bugmail has been sent it's out anyway)? *
> How strict is our UI freeze? Background:

I think that Joanmarie already pinged some people at the rt IRC channel,
but other possible topic is about how "real" this goal would be:
https://live.gnome.org/GnomeGoals/Python3Porting

BR

-- 
Alejandro Piñeiro Iglesias