Re: r-t meeting (topics)
- From: Andre Klapper <ak-47 gmx net>
- To: GNOME 4 release team <release-team gnome org>
- Subject: Re: r-t meeting (topics)
- Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2012 23:27:56 +0200
[More potential topics added at the bottom]
On Thu, 2012-10-04 at 13:04 +0200, Andre Klapper wrote:
> Potential topics (feel free to add/edit/comment):
> * 3.5/3.6 review: What worked out, what didn't?
> * Potential r-t membership changes
> * Release assignments for 3.7.x
> * First comments on 3.8 feature proposals?:
> https://live.gnome.org/ThreePointSeven/Features
>
> Not sure if these are r-t issues, but also something to sort out:
> * Is changing gsettings strings covered by freeze break or not?
> https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gnome-i18n/2012-September/msg00181.html
> * WebKitGTK+ has failed to produce a valid POT file (for L10N) for
> two years now. This makes Epiphany (and GNOME) look bad.
> The problem is somewhere between webkit and intltool. See e.g.
> https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=67580
> https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=81969
> https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45321
> I can provide more pointers if needed.
* Security bug reports: There's no real policy and clarity how to
escalate. Document who to contact and what to do in Bugzilla (e.g.
restrict access? Though once bugmail has been sent it's out anyway)?
* How strict is our UI freeze?
Background:
<andre> Don't we have a UI freeze?
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=685919
<bugbot> Bug 685919: gnome-shell, normal, Normal, ---,
gnome-shell-maint, RESOLVED FIXED, Make the screen shield look nicer
<walters> andre, well, it's just alignment, not anything substantial
<andre> that's again the "UI Freeze means UI Freeze or not" discussion
<andre> still it's a UI change.
<andre> and with the current policy we have it needs approvals.
<andre> if that doesn't make sense, we should change the policy. just
saying, not that I have a strong opinion.
<andre> maybe something for the r-t meeting...
<walters> so in this case we were missing the doc-list@ cc?
<mclasen> the few requests that came in after .0 have not gotten
responses at all, really...
<mclasen> so I can see why people would be reluctant to ask
<andre> I can also understand it
<andre> docs team is not very responsive
--
Andre Klapper | ak-47 gmx net
http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper/
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]