Re: Hard freeze exception for two regressions from pygobject 3.1.92
- From: Andre Klapper <ak-47 gmx net>
- To: Paolo Borelli <pborelli katamail com>
- Cc: Pölsterl <sebp k-d-w org>, Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu vizoso collabora com>, Sebastian menubar gnome org, release-team gnome org, Johan, Martin Pitt <martinpitt gnome org>, Dahlin <johan gnome org>
- Subject: Re: Hard freeze exception for two regressions from pygobject 3.1.92
- Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2012 10:34:19 +0100
On Thu, 2012-03-22 at 09:30 +0100, Paolo Borelli wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-03-21 at 18:50 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 12:39 PM, Martin Pitt <martinpitt gnome org> wrote:
> > > https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=668903
> > > http://git.gnome.org/browse/pygobject/commit/?id=efcb4b0b3
> > >
> > > https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=672463
> > > http://git.gnome.org/browse/pygobject/commit/?id=8d85d66
> >
> > Looks ok to me; if the bindings guys are in favor, +1 for the release team
>
> Just to clarify, all the pygobject maintainers agree with the request.
> Paolo
Approval 2 of 2 from the release-team.
andre
--
mailto:ak-47 gmx net | failed
http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]
