Re: GNOME 3.2.2 release post-morten comments

[Matthias Clasen <matthias clasen gmail com>]

On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 2:03 PM, Piñeiro <apinheiro igalia com> wrote:

> * On IRC some people guessed that the delay was some missing 3.2.2
> releases. Specifically ioni found strange a GNOME 3.2.2 release with a
> gnome-desktop 3.2.1
>   * Well, in my opinion this shouldn't be a reason to stop a GNOME release.
>   * We have deadlines, so IMHO they should be used as far as possible.
> As usual maintainers deadline was this Monday.
>   * I know that it is normal to include releases done after that
> deadline, and in fact asking maintainers to do new releases.
>   * But IMHO this should be a exception, to be used if something is
> failing, not a normal rule.
>   * And in fact, as this was a stable release, probably not all the
> people required to update the previous stable release.
>   * FWIW, there are about 30 modules with a 3.2.1 release on this GNOME
> 3.2.2 release.
>   * But who knows, probably I'm wrong. Opinions?

I don't expect .2 (and much less .3) releases to be 'full' in the
sense that every single module gets a new tarball.
There's really only a need to do a new tarball is if there are
important bug fixes, or if there are lots of translation updates.