Re: Freeze break request



On Wed, 2011-03-30 at 10:26 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 9:28 AM, Alexander Larsson <alexl redhat com> wrote:
> > There has been some discussions on how to best handle accidental deletes
> > in nautilus, and we've at last decided that the best way is a two-fold
> > approach:
> >
> > 1) Finish the undo work so you can easily get back things if you realize
> > you made a mistake
> > 2) Make the delete keybinding ctrl-delete rather than just delete to
> > make it harder to accidentally trigger this without noticing.
> >
> > The first is planned for 3.2, but the second has a patch at:
> > https://mail.gnome.org/archives/nautilus-list/2011-March/msg00041.html
> >
> > Unfortunately we and we sort of dropped the ball on that, so we're a bit
> > late.
> >
> > I'd still like to get this in for 3.0 though, as it is a better time to
> > make a behavior change like this than in a minor release.
> >
> > So, can I get a freeze break for this?
> 
> I guess I can see the argument that this would be a somewhat jarring
> behaviour change in a .1 release. It will be a jarring behaviour
> change for nautilus users in 3.0 too, though - have we thought about
> adding this to the release notes, eg ?

Yeah, that is probably a good idea. Do we mention this in the docs
anywhere else? (CC:ing docs list)

-- 
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
 Alexander Larsson                                            Red Hat, Inc 
       alexl redhat com            alexander larsson gmail com 
He's a superhumanly strong amnesiac gangster gone bad. She's a tortured 
foul-mouthed Valkyrie who can talk to animals. They fight crime! 



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]