Re: (Yet another) GNOME Shell freeze break request

[Matthias Clasen <matthias clasen gmail com>]

On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 1:35 PM, Owen Taylor <otaylor redhat com> wrote:

>
> We're doing a double-check policy on the gnome-shell and Mutter side -
> I've asked people to get approval from me as well as the release team
> and I'm double reviewing patches and trying to make sure that they are
> worth doing for 3.0.0. (I've pushed off roughly half of things I've
> considered to 3.0.1 at this point.) So I wouldn't treat freeze
> break requests to be asking the release-team to personally review and
> test patches and vouch for them in detail. (Though I'll never object to
> extra pairs of eyes.)
>
> We're mostly trying to a) make sure that the release-team has track of
> what's going in b) make sure that the changes we want to make are in
> line with GNOME policies.

Thanks again for being so careful. GNOME 3.0 will be better for this
(and GNOME 3.0.1 will rock even harder...)