Re: Freeze break request for gnome-panel: dropping drawers (and more)
- From: Matthias Clasen <matthias clasen gmail com>
- To: release-team gnome org, gnome-doc-list gnome org
- Cc: Vincent Untz <vuntz gnome org>
- Subject: Re: Freeze break request for gnome-panel: dropping drawers (and more)
- Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2011 15:03:05 -0400
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 5:24 AM, Vincent Untz <vuntz gnome org> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to request a freeze break for gnome-panel, to drop drawers.
> Here's the rationale:
> - there are always been various issues here and there, and they've
> never got fixed
> - it added complexity to the code
> - number of users using it is small
> - 3.0 is a good time to do this change
>
> This is really just removing code (35 files changed, 53 insertions(+),
> 4231 deletions(-)), it doesn't involve string changes (it removes
> strings but that's fine). From a documentation perspective, drawers were
> documented in the GNOME 2 doc, but I don't think they are in the new
> doc, so that shouldn't involve anything there either.
>
> Patch: http://tmp.vuntz.net/misc/0002-panel-Drop-drawers.patch
> (bugzilla is down, sorry :-))
>
> I'd also like to push a patch that removes the popup menu for items in
> the applications menu. This actually broke with GTK+ 3 and there was
> already agreement in GNOME 2 days that this wasn't really that great
> anyway. No impact on strings, and for documentation, I very much doubt
> this is mentioned in the GNOME 3 doc.
>
> Patch:
> http://tmp.vuntz.net/misc/0001-panel-Remove-popup-menu-for-items-in-applications-me.patch
>
> I have potential other patches coming in for gnome-panel (next one is
> killing the compatibility code that migrates pre-2.2 configuration;
> possibly moving quite some code around to prepare for gsettings
> migration, and maybe even gsettings migration itself)...
>
> Are you happy reviewing all of them, or does it make sense to add some
> hard code freeze exception (like starting the freeze next monday for the
> panel; I can release a new tarball then, to make sure changes get tested)?
>
I am sympathetic to the idea. I'll look at the patches when I get home.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]