Re: Moduleset Reorganization -- Take two

On Mon 31 Jan 2011 14:59, Murray Cumming <murrayc murrayc com> writes:

>> >  - there is no stronger API/ABI rules, but it's true we'd like to have
>> >    gtkmm follow the schedule.

I am also surprised at the lack of rules here, and additionally, the
lack of discussion.  Without the rules, it's just languages that people
like or see as strategic for some reason, and is disrespectful of those
bindings that chose to follow the 2.x bindings moduleset.  (Guile was
not one of them, FWIW.)

GNOME has done really well with libraries.  It would be good to continue
to extend this rigor to language bindings.

Regardless of the ultimate decision -- NB, not being discussed at
language-bindings gnome org -- the lack of communication from the
release team is lamentable.


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]