Re: introspection for 2.32

[Vincent Untz <vuntz gnome org>]

Replying to myself, to really include Colin the cc list :-)

Vincent

Le jeudi 09 septembre 2010, à 22:48 +0200, Vincent Untz a écrit :
> Le jeudi 09 septembre 2010, à 13:22 -0400, Colin Walters a écrit :
> > Hi,
> > 
> > I wanted to be sure you guys had seen:
> > http://mail.gnome.org/archives/gtk-devel-list/2010-August/msg00254.html
> > 
> > I just had a conversation with seb128 from Ubuntu.  Basically they
> > want to ship g-i 0.9.3, but in git master I've moved on and been
> > updating modules to use 0.9.5, with the understanding that for 2.32,
> > dependency uptake on introspection is low, so:
> > 
> > * It can be a "preview" state (and I'll do a 0.9.5 release for that), or
> > * it can be dropped for 2.32 (which means we lose a few gnome-games I believe)
> 
> Is it just a matter of rebuilding the packages that have introspection
> support? Or will they break in weird ways because of that change?
> 
> If it's just rebuilding, then it's fine. If it'll break everything, it's
> a bit more complex. I'm not sure I understand the choice you're
> proposing: is it 0.9.5 vs nothing? Why not 0.9.5 vs 0.9.3?
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Vincent
> 
> -- 
> Les gens heureux ne sont pas pressés.
> _______________________________________________
> release-team mailing list
> release-team gnome org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
> 

-- 
Les gens heureux ne sont pas pressés.