Re: Draft of 3.0 schedule

[Andre Klapper <ak-47 gmx net>]

Am Sonntag, den 31.01.2010, 11:07 +0100 schrieb Vincent Untz:
> I guess this was really a question for the a11y for at-spi-dbus vs
> at-spi-corba? In this case, I think they're doing the right thing by
> focusing the work on at-spi-dbus and still making it possible to use
> at-spi-corba: in this case, the preview vs stable question is kind of
> valid, and both will be provided.
> 
> Or is this question also important for other things?

Don't remember that exactly... :-/

So "Package maintainers and distributions are of course free to publish
further 2.x packages, but there won't be a complete GNOME 2.32 release
parallel to GNOME 3.0". Okay, clear.

andre
-- 
 mailto:ak-47 gmx net | failed
 http://www.iomc.de/  | http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper