Re: Request for comment (accessibility team): release date for GNOME 3.0
- From: Willie Walker <William Walker Sun COM>
- To: Francesco Fumanti <francesco fumanti gmx net>
- Cc: release-team gnome org, gnome-accessibility-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Request for comment (accessibility team): release date for GNOME 3.0
- Date: Sat, 07 Nov 2009 17:12:01 -0500
Hi Francesco:
- Is there any contact between the GNOME A11y Team and the GNOME Shell
developers?
Yes.
- Do the GNOME Shell developers know what properties have to be present
in the GNOME Shell to make it support a11y? As apparently, the GNOME
Shell is still a moving target, the sooner the GNOME Shell developers
know what to take care of, the better it will be for everybody; not only
for the disabled people requiring assistive tools, but probably also for
the GNOME Shell itself to have the best chances to become a widely used
desktop. (Is a11y not a requirement under specific circumstances to be
even accepted as a candidate for a computer system!?)
We've pointed out that keyboard traversal, communication with the
AT-SPI, and theming are important. These are core fundamental things
that the current solution does not provide.
Note that the GNOME Shell team is churning away and developing rapidly.
We need them to succeed and provide something sexy for GNOME 3.0. The
churn, IMO, is the result of them needing to experiment with various
solutions. One important thing is the decision about which graphical
toolkit they end up using -- right now, they are using their own fork of
NBTK. This toolkit, which is inaccessible, is likely the thing that
will end up needing the work. Note, however, that it doesn't make sense
to invest heavily in making it accessible if they are going to drop it
for something else.
As I mention, I can resign myself to the fact that the message about
a11y has been delivered and received. The GNOME Shell team, which is
composed of senior members of the GNOME community, has information
needed to help them include a11y in their decision making. For now, I'm
OK with keeping out of their way, but will keep advocating they include
a11y in their decision making processes.
So, on one side, I'm advocating strongly for a11y, and on another I am
sensitive to the issues the GNOME Shell team is facing at the moment.
Will
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]