Re: libunique external dependency for 2.25?


Le jeudi 02 octobre 2008, à 23:23 +0100, Emmanuele Bassi a écrit :
> while the ultimate goal *is* to have this functionality inside gtk+ I'm
> nowhere near having the time to integrate it myself - not in the way I
> want it integrated[1], at the very least.
> another issue is that libunique is pretty much a testing ground for API
> and requirements and while the basic functionality is obviously already
> implemented I still receive requests[2] that make sense to add *before*
> putting the whole shebang in gtk+. we do put stuff in libegg to have it
> ready for later integration with a reasonable set of API, right?

So, it seems nautilus now depends on libunique. I understand the plan is
to fix this in gtk+ (hopefully in 2.16), but it will not happen for 2.26
since we'll have gtk+ 2.14. Does it make sense to use libunique for this
now, only for 2.26?


Les gens heureux ne sont pas pressés.

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]