Re: Requesting Freeze break for stable branch - GNOME 2.22 - bug 273627
- From: Chenthill <pchenthill novell com>
- To: Andre Klapper <ak-47 gmx net>
- Cc: PC Radhika <PRadhika novell com>, gnome-i18n gnome org, gnome-doc-list gnome org, "mcrha redhat com" <mcrha redhat com>, release-team gnome org, Srinivasa Ragavan <SRagavan novell com>
- Subject: Re: Requesting Freeze break for stable branch - GNOME 2.22 - bug 273627
- Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 17:34:09 +0530
On Fri, 2008-06-27 at 13:38 +0200, Andre Klapper wrote:
> Am Freitag, den 27.06.2008, 16:47 +0530 schrieb Chenthill:
> > Currently it is not possible to configure a exchange account in
> > evolution if the mailbox name and account name are different which is a
> > major issue. This patch adds a new Entry to the account configuration
> > window to allow the user to specify the mailbox name if its different.
> > The author of the patch is Milan (mcrha redhat com). The patch does not
> > break any API/ABI. This has been reviewed and tested well enough. More
> > details can be found in the bug.
> >
> > The patch can be found at
> > http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=273627#c88 .
>
> and in http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=273627#c100 i asked for
> information on user doc updates - afaik evo user docs are still handled
> by novell? haven't seen any updates, neither to text nor screenshots.
> there is at least one screenshot affected,
> http://svn.gnome.org/svn/evolution/trunk/help/C/figures/exchng-rec-mails.png, i also expect http://svn.gnome.org/svn/evolution/trunk/help/C/figures/exchng-rec-mail.png to be affected. and we have some docs translation in svn that ship those translated screenshots.
>
Yes Radhika handles it. Adding her in CC list. She would be updating the
docs before this weekend if approved.
> i love the patch and it's awesome to have this finally fixed, but this
> is the "late friday afternoon request before a monday's tarballs due",
> totally ignoring about translators and documentation updates. this could
> have been requested 10 days earlier, and i had asked for this several
> times.
My mistake :( I just postponed it and missed it off.
- Chenthill.
> so i will not give my r-t +1, but others feel free to approve. :-)
> andre
>
> PS: johannes: it's not really a regression, iirc it's been always like
> that.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]