Re: Fix java-gnome version
- From: Vincent Untz <vuntz gnome org>
- To: Andrew Cowie <andrew operationaldynamics com>, Olav Vitters <olav bkor dhs org>, release-team gnome org
- Subject: Re: Fix java-gnome version
- Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 16:49:51 +0100
Hi,
Le lundi 25 février 2008, à 23:34 +0100, Vincent Untz a écrit :
> Hi Andrew,
>
> Le lundi 25 février 2008, à 21:39 +1100, Andrew Cowie a écrit :
> > On Mon, 2008-02-25 at 09:58 +0100, Olav Vitters wrote:
> > > Can you add some more detail?
> >
> > Yes. All that crap collectively was java-gnome 2.16.3. The whole set was
> > minutely interdependent and unbelievably tightly coupled. When I did
> > releases through the 2005-2006 period we named the set as a whole
> > "java-gnome version whatever" in an attempt to provide some coherence.
> >
> > > I noticed that the java-gnome website
> > > refers to 'java-gnome' module. Does that replace all the things listed
> > > above?
> >
> > Yup.
> >
> > The tarballs are all here,
> > http://ftp.gnome.org/pub/GNOME/sources/java-gnome/4.0/
> >
> > and the release notes incrementally added to the top of,
> > http://java-gnome.sourceforge.net/4.0/NEWS.html
>
> I guess this is breaking compatibility with older versions? If yes, we
> need to advertize this.
>
> Also, is API stable in those releases, or is it still in development?
> Last time I asked, I was told the status of the new java-gnome was
> beta.
Didn't get a reply. I'm going the conservative way and releasing with
2.16.x. As far as I understand it, 4.0 is a development version that
will lead to a stable 4.2.
Vincent
--
Les gens heureux ne sont pas pressés.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]