Re: gio/gvfs vs. hardcode freeze.

[Olav Vitters <olav bkor dhs org>]

On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 03:06:20PM +0100, Vincent Untz wrote:
> Le mercredi 27 février 2008, à 14:52 +0100, Andre Klapper a écrit :
> > i propose to not include gio/gvfs for hardcode freeze on monday to
> > hopefully get in some more fixes (if they do not include string
> > changes) and regressions like
> > http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=517632 (nobody working on it
> > afaik) or http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=509620 (ftp support,
> > Company is on it).
> > perhaps giving them a few more days makes sense, like "hardcode freeze
> > on thursday for gio/gvfs/nautilus and (as before) on monday for all
> > other modules". it would also be another signal from the r-t that we
> > definitely back them in their efforts to get it done.
> > if we agreed on this we should tell alex and the hackers in #nautilus
> > about.
> > 
> > not sure if my idea makes sense, comments?
> 
> I think we should first discuss with Alex if he thinks it's needed. If
> it is, I'm +1 for it.

+1 for above

-- 
Regards,
Olav