Re: gio/gvfs vs. hardcode freeze.

[Vincent Untz <vuntz gnome org>]

Le mercredi 27 février 2008, à 14:52 +0100, Andre Klapper a écrit :
> i propose to not include gio/gvfs for hardcode freeze on monday to
> hopefully get in some more fixes (if they do not include string
> changes) and regressions like
> http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=517632 (nobody working on it
> afaik) or http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=509620 (ftp support,
> Company is on it).
> perhaps giving them a few more days makes sense, like "hardcode freeze
> on thursday for gio/gvfs/nautilus and (as before) on monday for all
> other modules". it would also be another signal from the r-t that we
> definitely back them in their efforts to get it done.
> if we agreed on this we should tell alex and the hackers in #nautilus
> about.
> 
> not sure if my idea makes sense, comments?

I think we should first discuss with Alex if he thinks it's needed. If
it is, I'm +1 for it.

Vincent

-- 
Les gens heureux ne sont pas pressés.