Re: hal requirement of gvfs
- From: Frederic Crozat <fcrozat mandriva com>
- To: Vincent Untz <vuntz gnome org>
- Cc: release-team gnome org, David Zeuthen <davidz redhat com>, Alexander Larsson <alexl redhat com>, Matthias Clasen <mclasen redhat com>
- Subject: Re: hal requirement of gvfs
- Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 13:42:59 +0100
Le lundi 11 février 2008 à 18:39 +0100, Frederic Crozat a écrit :
> Le lundi 11 février 2008 à 18:17 +0100, Vincent Untz a écrit :
> > Le lundi 11 février 2008, à 11:54 -0500, Matthias Clasen a écrit :
> > > Hey guys,
> > >
> > > Some time ago, David Zeuthen asked for the minimal hal requirement to be
> > > bumped from 0.5.9 to 0.5.10 (see
> > > http://www.mail-archive.com/desktop-devel-list gnome org/msg11794.html )
> > >
> > > For some reason this didn't happen, but nevertheless, gvfs doesn't build
> > > against 0.5.9 (gvfs/configure only checks for 0.5.9, though, which is an
> > > oversight...).
> > >
> > > So either we have to bump the minimal hal requirement, or come up with a
> > > workaround in gvfs. Alex quickly looked at that this morning, but it
> > > looks like it will be somewhat slow and painful. Unfortunately, David is
> > > not going to be around until Thursday to help out with this either.
> > Hrm, weird: I thought that we accepted to bump the hal version or
> > that it was not needed in the end.
> > I'm fine with bumping the version. Any other opinion?
> Go ahead
I have committed this change in jhbuild in preparation of GNOME 2.21.91
Frederic Crozat <fcrozat mandriva com>
] [Thread Prev