Re: [Fwd: Re: roadmap as a bugzilla blockers]



ahoj,

Bruno Boaventura píše v St 28. 11. 2007 v 17:13 -0300:
> On Nov 28, 2007 2:03 PM, Gil Forcada <gilforcada guifi net> wrote:
> > > I was wondering if it will be useful to have a blocker named GNOME 2.22
> > > in bugzilla and the same for every app in GNOME and enter (or marked as
> > > a dependency) of the first one, finally every feature planned in the
> > > RoadMap should be filled and marked as a dependency for the per-app
> > > blocker
> > >
> > > for what? just to keep track, since bugzilla marks the resolved bugs, a
> > > brief look at the global blocker will tell us if the GNOME 2.22 global
> > > RoadMap (or per-app) is going well :)
> 
> I think the roadmaps are not mandatory, they may not be met by some
> modules, thus we can't block the release because of roadmaps.
> 
> What are other bugsquaders' opinions?

i think you mentioned to different things here. :)

we have gnome-target milestones in bugzilla, see 
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/buglist.cgi?query=meta-status:open,needinfo+gnome-target=2.22.x
this is a setting for blockers only, means worst crashers or big
interoperability or compile problems. it's not a "we would like to have
this done by 2.22" wishlist.

if we would have a GNOME 2.22 tracking/metabug and add other roadmap
stuff as dependencies, it would indeed be easier to track progress and
control of how much of aims were achieved. in this case it also wouldn't
matter whether roadmap tasks are mandatory or not. evolution had a
tracking bug for gnome 2.13 (see
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=327508 ) and there are still a
lot of unresolved dependencies, because it was abused as a wishlist bug.
another way could be to add a status whiteboard entry like
"roadmap[2.22]" to the affected bug reports. basically the same as
above, advantage: don't count the numbers manually (because bugzilla's
query will tell you), disadvantage: you can't CC to the metabug and get
informed of fixed dependencies.

andre
-- 
 mailto:ak-47 gmx net | failed
 http://www.iomc.de/

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Toto je =?UTF-8?Q?digit=C3=A1ln=C4=9B?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_podepsan=E1?= =?UTF-8?Q?_=C4=8D=C3=A1st?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_zpr=E1vy?=



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]