Re: [REQUEST]: Hard Code Freeze Break request - GtkHTML

[Vincent Untz <vuntz gnome org>]

Le lundi 12 mars 2007, à 16:11, Frederic Crozat a écrit :
> Le lundi 12 mars 2007 à 19:57 +0530, Harish Krishnaswamy a écrit :
> > Hi ,
> > 
> >  Sorry for this very-late bother but I just observed this patch left
> > uncommitted at
> > http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=401970.
> > 
> > The patch appears to modify the so names of the gtkhtml library as
> > well as update the API version so as not to break gnucash.  This fix,
> > I learn from the patch, does not introduce a binary incompatibility
> > but merely reconciles an earlier change that had broken the ABI.
> > It had been reviewed and approved for commit by the GtkHTML package
> > maintainer, Srinivasa Ragavan, prior to the Hard Code freeze but was
> > not included in the 3.13.92 release or committed to svn.
> > 
> > If this change is absorbed, the corresponding dependency in the
> > Evolution package will also have to be updated.
> > 
> > I have been unable to reach Srinivasa Ragavan but from
> > http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=401970#c11,
> > it appears this change needs to be in so as not to break gnucash (and
> > other apps that depend on gtkhtml [1])
> > 
> > Is it OK for me to commit this change to GtkHTML, so I can test and
> > then roll out the evolution tarballs ?
> 
> Approval 1 of 2.

2 of 2, because we don't want to break other software.

Vincent

-- 
Les gens heureux ne sont pas pressés.