On Wednesday 01 November 2006 01:41, guenther wrote: > On Tue, 2006-10-31 at 18:41 +0100, Tobias Toedter wrote: > > I like the idea of having a symlink which points to the latest > > available version. I don't know if this is helping the GNOME people, > > though. However, it should not be a problem to leave old releases of > > iso-codes on the server, instead of deleting them. > > As far as GARNOME, the build utility for the GNOME Desktop, is > concerned, we would need old tarballs to be left on the server. By > default GARNOME checks the MD5 hash of each (automatically) downloaded > tarball, thus a moving "latest" target unfortunately does not help. > Keeping old releases would rock. :) OK, let's rock, then. :) Are there any specific releases which you currently need? We could then regenerate those tarballs first. At the moment, we provide tarballs for iso-codes 0.57 and 0.58. Regards, Tobias -- Tobias Toedter | Right now I'm having amnesia and deja vu at the Hamburg, Germany | same time. I think I've forgotten this before.
Attachment:
pgp4y8Muhp2hP.pgp
Description: PGP signature