Re: Liboobs versions

On 12/11/06, Kjartan Maraas <kmaraas broadpark no> wrote:
søn, 10.12.2006 kl. 18.36 -0700, skrev Elijah Newren:
> On 12/5/06, Carlos Garnacho <carlosg gnome org> wrote:
> > I just learnt that liboobs is considered an external dependency, I
> > (naively?) thought that it was a desktop module, given that it contains
> > 90% of the logical weight of g-s-t and based on a brief conversation
> > with the release team some time ago [1].
> >
> > Maybe should liboobs be considered a Desktop module?
> Yes, this looks like an oversight.  Given that it contains what was
> part of g-s-t previously I think that makes sense.  Thanks for
> pointing this out.
Does this go for libgnomekbd too then since that was part of
gnome-control-center before being split out?

Yes, I think so.  Unless there are any objections...   :)

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]