Re: GNOME 2.12 is slated to be our worst release -- ever!

[Harish Krishnaswamy <kharish novell com>]

On Mon, 2005-09-05 at 19:59 +0000, Olav Vitters wrote:
> 2005/9/5, Elijah Newren <newren gmail com>:
> > On 9/5/05, Olav Vitters <ovitters gmail com> wrote:
> > > [Cleaned up cc list a little]
> > >
> > > 2005/9/5, Elijah Newren <newren gmail com>:
> > > > > 6. Marking mail as Junk - Evolution crashes - Regressing 311956
> > > >
> > > > Um, it's marked as fixed...
> > >
> > > No, that was the description. This is actually bug 315259, a
> > > 'regression' from bug 311956. Doesn't really seem a regression, the
> > > fix just caused a crasher with another stacktrace.
> > 
> > Bug 315259 is a gnome-applets bug; 311956 an evolution one.  I don't
> > see the connection--perhaps another bug was meant? (e.g. 314942 which
> > you also described later in your email--though you also twisted that
> > one and reused the unrelated number 314346 for it?)
> 
> Heh. That bug doesn't want to be found. I indeed mean bug 314942.

Hi,

 Both the bugs marked against Evolution (314297 and 314942) are related
to the GW backend and against specific build instances of the GW server.
They have been targeted for the Evolution 2.4.1 release against a GW
Service Pack release, that is still awaited.

  Neither of them can be considered showstoppers for the GNOME 2.12
release (the QA has not marked them as Cri/Blo either). The only
Evolution-GW deployments that exist today are that of Beta Customers. I
am not sure how/why the two bugs are part of the list. 

Kindly take them off the list.

Thanks,
Harish