Re: [evolution-patches] Re: patch for bug 312857
- From: Harish Krishnaswamy <kharish novell com>
- To: Not Zed <notzed ximian com>
- Cc: evolution-patches gnome org, Vincent Untz <vuntz gnome org>, release-team gnome org, Susarla Parthasarathi <SParthasarathi novell com>
- Subject: Re: [evolution-patches] Re: patch for bug 312857
- Date: Mon, 05 Sep 2005 10:07:29 +0530
Oops !!! This is big-time screw up. The patch had been reviewed offline
and a wrong earlier version posted to the list. Thanks for pointing it
out. Apologies to the release team..
Vivek/Partha : Can you pl. make sure the right patch is posted to the
list.
Harish
On Mon, 2005-09-05 at 10:19 +0800, Not Zed wrote:
> You have totally got to be kidding me. This code can't possible work
> reliably, it has a blatantly obvious race just setting up the mutex. A
> static mutex MUST be pre-initialised or initialised using some other
> atomic means.
>
> + if (!mutex)
> + mutex = g_mutex_new ();
>
> + if (!g_mutex_try_lock (mutex))
> + return;
>
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]