Re: Propose pyorbit for 2.13/2.14?

["John (J5) Palmieri" <johnp redhat com>]

On Mon, 2005-11-14 at 18:53 +0100, Vincent Untz wrote:
> Le lundi 14 novembre 2005 �9:40 -0700, Elijah Newren a �it :
> > On 11/14/05, Gustavo J. A. M. Carneiro <gjc inescporto pt> wrote:
> > >   OK, here's my personal opinion, from the point of view of probably the
> > > only person that's likely to be willing to maintain pyorbit (please
> > > correct me if I'm wrong).
> > >
> > >   I think it's a good idea to propose it, as long as it doesn't mean I
> > > have to do real development just because it's included. :P  Honestly,
> > > given the lack of interest of the GNOME project in ORBit2, I don't think
> > > it's profitable for the project that I invest much time with
> > > development.  I can promise to review patches in bugzilla, maybe fix
> > > simple bus, and push out releases, but that's it.  Anyway, I think
> > > pyorbit is great, and it's stable, so not much development is needed
> > > anyway.
> > 
> > I think that'd be a perfect way to handle it.
> 
> Yep, I agree.

Same here.

-- 
John (J5) Palmieri <johnp redhat com>